From each of the furniture objects, the chair could be the most important. While most of the other forms (save the bed) are devised to support objects, the chair supports a human form. The term chair should be regarded here in the most general sense, from stool to throne to complex forms for example the bench and sofa, which can be considered as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not obviously distinguished.
The social history of the chair is as stimulating as its history as an art and craft. The chair is not just a physical support and aesthetic artwork; it historically was semiotic of social placement. From the past royal courts there were important connotations between being seated on a chair with arms, sitting on a chair with a back but no arms, and having to use a stool. From the past century, the director’s or manager’s chair has risen a symbol of superior position, as well as in democratic government meeting the speaker sits on a higher platform.
In its furniture construction, the chair is used for a variety of different purposes. There are chairs structured to fit man’s age and physical abilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and for his rank in society (the executive chair, the throne). From past days there were chairs used for birth (birth chairs); since the 20th century, there have been chairs used to die in (the electric chair). There are chairs with one, two, three, or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can have chairs that can be folded for easy storage, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our lifestyle has developed special chairs for automobiles and aircraft. Every one of these chair types have perfected to conform to different human uses. Due to its close relationship with man, the chair lives to its full advantage only when in use. Though it is not relevant to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a chest of drawers whether there might be items inside or not, a chair is best seen and fairly tested by a person sitting on it, for chair and sitter suit the other. Thus the different areas of the chair are given names likened to the elements of a human form: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the basic function of the chair is to support our human body, its worth is tested basically on how completely it does measure up to this practical purpose. Within the construction of the chair, the carpenter is restricted by particular static regulation and principal measurements. Within these limitations, however, the chair designer has awesome freedom.
The history of the chair extended over dates of several thousand years. There is evidence of cultures that had made significant chair forms, expressive of the leading object in the arenas of skill and art. In such peoples, individual note needs to be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the ascendancy of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the objects of skilled make, are today known from tomb discoveries. One of the two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The typical Egyptian chair would have four legs crafted as akin to those of a designated animal, a curved seat, and leading to a sloping back supported over vertical stretchers. In this design a stable triangular construction was created. There seemed to be no noteworthy change in the design of Egyptian thrones and chairs for ordinary peasantry. The only variation exists in the type of ornamentation, in the evidence of expensive inlays. The Egyptian folding stool probably was designed for an easily carried seat for army soldiers. As a camp stool the stool stayed til much later points in time. But the stool then took on the task of a ceremonial seat, its technical role as a folding stool being forgotten. This can now be seen, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, executed in ebony with ivory inlay ornamentation and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They were constructed in the shape of folding stools but cannot be folded as the seats are created from wood. The simple make of the folding stool, consisting of two frames that spin on metal bolts and have a seat of leather or fabric set between them, can be seen some time later from the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The most well known of those is the folding stool, from ashwood, which can now be found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The typical Greek chair, the klismos, is known not with any ancient object still existing but as seen from a large amount of pictorial objects. The archetype is the klismos displayed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial location near Athens (c. 410 BC). This is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of which were seen. These strange legs were possibly created with bent wood and were therefore put under a large amount of pressure under the weight of the sitter. The joints holding the legs to the frame of the seat had to be therefore super durable and were clearly drawn.
The Romans borrowed from the Greek design; existing models of seated Romans offer evidence of a heavier and apparently kind of more crudely constructed klismos. Both types, the light and heavy, were seen again in the Classicist period. The klismos style is found in French Empire furniture, in English Regency, and in special forms of considerable uniqueness within Denmark and Sweden around 1800.
China
The ancestry of the chair in China is not able to be traced as far as the progression of the chairs in Egypt and Greece. From the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unbroken serial of sketches and paintings was kept safe, with images of the interior and outer parts of Chinese households and the designs of furniture. Kept also from the 16th century are some chairs made from wood or lacquered wood, that hold an intriguing familiarity to styles of ancient chairs.
Same as in Egypt, there existed two iconic chair forms in China: a chair with four legs and a folding stool. This four-legged chair has been designed both with or without arms though always having its square seat and straight stiles (vertical side supports) to give support to the back. In one style, though, the stiles could be lightly curved on top of the arms in order to conform to the shape of the S-shaped back splat (the main upright of its chairback). Together, the three limbs were mortised onto the yoke-like top rail. Despite that the innovation of this back splat then had an inspiration for English chairs in the Queen Anne period, wooden members that merely to a limited capability stabilise corner joints (and then are loose into the bargain) signify a design signatory to Chinese chairs. The four legs sit through the seat frame, which stops about the rounded staves. Every member is round in section or is given rounded edges—a left over as may be to the bamboo tradition. The seat is unpleasant to sit in and might have had a plaited texture. These chairs needed the sitter to be stiff and upright; for if too much weight is forced on the back, the chair has a way of toppling over. In patriarchal Chinese homes of this period armchairs presumably were kept only for older family members, for they were held in great respect.
The Chinese folding stool is understood to have come to China from the West. It does not vary so very much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a dissimilarity in that the top rail is prettily held to the two legs of the stool in a curved member, which is more often than not designed with metal mounts. From a Western viewpoint the ultimate effect of both furniture styles is stylized. The constructive and aesthetic parts are combined in a manner that is all at once both naïve and refined. The pieced-together appearance is an upshot of the manner that the individual members do not look to have been constructed by either glue or screws, but were mortised with one another and held in position in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain in the 17th century also left its signature on the chair. Paintings project a type of chair with a relatively crude wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, having only two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between, stitched to bring out a pattern of small pads. The front board and a similar board from the back could be folded after unscrewing some tiny iron hooks. In this way the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture when traveling which, at the same era, possessed the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered type of chair can be evidenced in engravings of interiors of rich Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and also in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this design of chair can also be made in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won acclaim, it is not certain that the style actually was instigated in The Netherlands. Usually, the legs of the chair will be smooth, round in section, and of slim shape; they are sometimes baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is patently a bourgeois piece of furniture and was manufactured in impressive numbers, as surmisable from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is a whole row of those chairs lined up by a wall. The design asserts itself by virtue of its shapely proportions and expensive upholstery in gilt leather or fabric bordered with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature of forms—that was, to say, as brought out in Paris around 1750—disseminated over most of Europe and was imitated or copied during the mid-20th century. The chair owes the popularity to a combination of comfort and elegance. The seat conforms to the human body and allows a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Normally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are little upholstered pads covering the armrests. Smooth transitions made between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are stable, constructed on craftsmanlike methodology in spite of the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations thereof have wood of quite thick dimensions; but each member is deeply molded, all extra wood has been sanded away, and more upmarket designs might be further embellished with intricately delicate and decorative carvings. The wood may be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is often used for all of the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; canework is occasionally used rather than upholstery.
English chairs in the 18th century were more varied in design than the French. The French preference for stylistic uniformity, which lead from the most distinguished circles in Paris and Versailles through most of France and became the preference in large parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became reknowned and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper versions of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, indicate that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on reception desks in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content